Maricopa County News Release

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office Special Victims Division Chief Selected by Senate Judiciary Committee. View News Release below

0

Findings from the Misdemeanor Justice Project

The Effectiveness of Traditional Enforcement Strategies and Importance of Defense Counsel

 Michael Herring, Cecilia Low-Weiner, and Preeti Chauhan

 The Misdemeanor Justice Project at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, released a special issue of Criminal Justice Policy Review on the criminal justice system’s response to lower-level offenses. Four of the nine articles provide valuable insights for prosecutors.

 

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES

Prosecutors often have the opportunity to support police departments in building goodwill between the police and the community. Results from Piza (2018) suggest that traditional policing techniques may not be the most effective at crime prevention. Indeed, his results indicate that guardian policing actions (e.g., citizen contacts, business checks, taxi inspections) have greater crime prevention effects than traditional enforcement actions (e.g., arrests, summonses, field interrogations). Prosecutors may wish to assist police by encouraging the use of community building methods like guardian actions for public safety. Another study suggests that implicit bias may play a role in determining who enters the courtroom and prosecutors may wish to think through the fairness and effectiveness of enforcement actions such as stops, particularly when wishing to enhance police-community relationships. Chanin et. al. (2018) found although Black drivers were more likely to be searched after a traffic stop, the likelihood of a search resulting in the seizure of contraband was lower than for White drivers.  These results question traditional enforcement strategies from public safety and legitimacy perspectives.

 

THE IMPORTANCE OF DEFENSE COUNSEL

Effective and fair court proceedings are of paramount concern to prosecutors. The role of defense counsel in achieving these goals is critical. Both public defenders and prosecutors share similar goals of reducing the unnecessary involvement of individuals in the criminal justice system and creating a more equitable and just system. Knowing this, prosecutors wishing to efficiently handle lower-level cases and increase the public’s confidence in prosecutors’ objectivity and fairness may wish to advocate for the presence of counsel, even for lower-level crimes.

 

The presence of defense counsel may decrease constitutional violations, wrongful convictions, and disproportionate punishments. Harvey et. al. (2018) found that the right to counsel, in misdemeanor prosecutions, was frequently violated and led to misguided plea bargains, invalid waivers, and unconstitutional sentences in no-lawyer courts in St. Louis. The Worden et. al. (2018), study found that when counsel was present at first appearance, defendants were more likely to be released on recognizance or have a lower bail amount set. These results highlight the value and need for an adversarial environmental to ensure a fairer system.

 

0

Peter Strasser sworn in as U.S. attorney for New Orleans office

Former longtime federal prosecutor Peter Strasser took the helm of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Orleans on Monday after a quiet swearing-in ceremony.

Confirmed late last month by the U.S. Senate, Strasser becomes the first presidentially appointed U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana in 18 months, since Kenneth Polite Jr. was swept out in a March 2017 purge by the Trump administration of all U.S. attorneys named by former President Barack Obama.

Strasser, 64, leaves the Chaffe McCall law firm, where he was a partner and sparred with some of the same prosecutors he will now lead, as he defended clients in some high-profile cases involving gangs, drugs and a murder-for-hire plot.

Strasser was sworn in by U.S. District Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown in a private ceremony Monday morning. By afternoon he was settling into his new 17th-floor office. Dressed casually in a linen jacket and tasseled loafers with no socks, Strasser sidestepped questions over how he plans to put his stamp on an office that has seen its share of upheaval in recent years.

He said he had been meeting informally with members of the office during the past week or so at a nearby coffee shop, just to get to know them on a personal level. He’s also been reviewing their resumés and said he’s been blown away by the caliber of the staff, which includes 58 prosecutors.

“I’ve never seen such a bright, talented, brilliant group of people,” he said. If the U.S. Attorney’s Office were a private law firm, he said, “we’d put every other law firm out of business.”

He said there will be some reshuffling of the deck in terms of leadership positions in the office, but his entire team will be drawn from the roster of existing employees. He already has picked the new leaders but can’t announce them until they’ve been approved by the Department of Justice, he said.

Strasser, who was among the first to throw his hat in the ring for the U.S. attorney’s job last year, wryly compared the process to running for political office, but noted that the campaign takes place completely outside of public view and doesn’t require any fundraising.

“Like anything in life, it’s a competition,” he said.

He said he met with “literally hundreds” of people during his quest for the post, including members of “the business community, the law enforcement community, the political community, the government community and the legal community.”

He wanted the job because he takes an “extreme satisfaction in fighting crime,” he said. That passion was enhanced, he said, during stints in developing countries like Pakistan, Malawi and Georgia, where as a legal attaché Strasser helped teach local prosecutors to become more professional.

He described public corruption, white-collar crime and “guns and drugs” as the traditional “troika” of federal law enforcement. Strasser, who has lived in the same Uptown neighborhood since the 1980s, bristled at the notion that the U.S. attorney might emphasize one of those spheres over others.

“I don’t like crime,” he said flatly. “It’s crime that’s ruining this city. I don’t care if it’s coming from a street corner, if it’s coming from a corporate boardroom, if it’s coming from City Hall or what. And I have a talented staff that I’m gonna let loose.”

Asked whom he considers a role model, he cited John Volz, who was the U.S. attorney in New Orleans when Strasser began working in the office. Volz was appointed by President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and continued to serve under Ronald Reagan, a Republican. Volz died in 2011.

Strasser’s wasn’t the first name that U.S. Sen. John Kennedy forwarded to the Trump administration to lead one of 93 U.S. attorney’s offices in the country. Pugnacious defense attorney Kyle Schonekas had that honor, before his chances sank for unknown reasons.

But Strasser had been the presumed nominee since late last year, withstanding a vetting process that has dragged out for many U.S. attorney’s offices around the country.

He is the last of Trump’s three U.S. attorney picks in Louisiana. Brandon Fremin has been confirmed by the Senate as U.S. attorney for the Middle District, while David Joseph was confirmed as U.S. attorney for the Western District.

It’s common for new administrations, particularly with a switch of parties in the White House, to make wholesale changes at the top of U.S. Attorney’s offices nationwide.

Two New Orleans-area figures – Volz and former U.S. Attorney Jim Letten – bucked that tendency; both served for over a decade under both GOP and Democratic presidents.

The Eastern District encompasses 13 parishes in the southeastern part of the state, including the New Orleans metropolitan area. Prosecutor Duane Evans has served as acting U.S. attorney since Polite’s departure.

A native of Charlottesville, Virginia, Strasser earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and his law degree from Washington and Lee University.

He spent the first few years of his legal career as a lawyer with the Judge Advocate General’s Corps, the U.S. Army’s legal arm, according to a copy of his resumé posted on LinkedIn.

Strasser moved to New Orleans in 1984 to work as an assistant U.S. attorney, a job he held for 18 years, eventually heading the fraud and organized crime sections in that office.

He was on the prosecution team that convicted former Gov. Edwin Edwards of racketeering in 2001.

He was the lead prosecutor in the 1995 federal bank fraud case against former Jefferson Parish Council Chairman Bob Evans, who was acquitted of all charges.

Strasser left the U.S. Attorney’s Office in 2002 but remained with the Department of Justice as a legal attaché, working at embassies in Africa, Europe and Asia. He returned to New Orleans in 2013 to join Chaffe McCall.

As a defense attorney, he was among the first in New Orleans to voice allegations of misconduct against Chad Scott, a longtime U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agent who is facing 10 corruption-related charges, including perjury and obstruction of justice.

Strasser also represented Damian “A.D.” Barnes, one of 10 alleged “39’ers” gang members accused of more than a dozen murders and extensive drug-dealing activity in New Orleans. A jury convicted Barnes on racketeering, drug and firearms conspiracy charges but acquitted him in the April 2011 murder of Floyd Moore.

In that trial, early last year, Strasser got into a heated argument with Assistant U.S. Attorney Myles Ranier that turned into a minor physical tussle, with Strasser either pushing or poking Ranier in the chest.

The incident prompted a recent jab on Twitter from Polite, the former U.S. attorney, but didn’t derail Strasser’s path through the Senate.

0

Animal cruelty on the rise

KINGSLEY — Despite its scope, the animal abandonment case discovered in Kingsley in July, in which at least 38 animals were removed from a Voice Road residence and two people were arrested, is not an anomaly according to state and local records.

Incidences of animal cruelty reported to the Michigan State Police rose 575 percent statewide between 2016 and 2017, the latest year for which figures are available, according to the MSP’s 2017 Quality Assurance Report.

Of the 98 crime categories tracked by the MSP, only three — fraud hacking/computer invasion, narcotic equipment violations, and possession of burglary tools — had a higher increase.

Grand Traverse County Prosecutor Bob Cooney says animal cruelty cases are on the rise locally, too. In 2015, two cases were referred to his office for prosecution; in 2016 it was 20 cases; in 2017 it was 18 cases; and so far this year Cooney said his office has already investigated 15 cases.

“I know, as a prosecutor, the amount of public concern over these cases,” Cooney said. “The public gets really upset if an animal is abused.”

Cooney said that depending on the level of cruelty, the number of animals involved, and whether the alleged abuser has previous convictions, animal abuse cases can be prosecuted as a felony.

Since becoming prosecutor in 2012, Cooney said he or his staff have prosecuted a variety of animal abusers, from a Louisiana man who was hunting in the Williamsburg area and had “coolers and coolers full of squirrel carcasses,” to an Acme man who shot and killed a golden retriever after it ran into his yard.

Cooney, a dog owner, said that like most people, animal suffering repels him, but once someone is arrested for neglecting or abusing their pet, he immediately has additional concerns.

“People who abuse animals tend to take it to the next step,” he said.

By “next step” Cooney was specifically referencing domestic violence, something Sue Bolde, executive director of Traverse Bay Children’s Advocacy Center on Chartwell Drive in Traverse City, has dealt with in her work as a clinical psychologist specializing in children and teens.

“Where there is animal abuse, there is often a child or family in danger,” she said, in a an article published on the center’s website titled, “The Direct Link Between Animal Abuse and Child Abuse.”

In Leelanau County, prosecutor Joe Hubbell said he has not seen as dramatic a rise in such cases.

In 2014 and 2015 there were no cases referred to his office; in 2016 there were three cases referred, in 2017 one case and none so far this year. Hubbell did say, however, that the cases he has prosecuted over the years have been particularly dire. Dozens of sick and injured horses, badly neglected sheep, and a puppy kicked to death, for example.

In Benzie County, two cases were referred to Prosecutor Sara Swanson in 2017. She said when pets are found to have been neglected for economic reasons, those cases are thoroughly investigated but not always referred to her office for prosecution.

“Animal Control will ask to take possession of the animals, we find them new homes, and if people aren’t fighting that then these kinds of cases tend to be handled more out of the court system.”

According to Shanon Banner, MSP spokesperson, animal cruelty was added as a stand-alone offense category in 2016, after the Federal Bureau of Investigation deemed it a “crime against society.”

Authorities say economic hardship, an increase in substance abuse, a lack of funding for spay and neuter programs, and the growing willingness on the part of the public to call Animal Control when they see an animal being neglected or abused could also be contributing to the dramatic increase.

The June 29 firing of Grand Traverse County Animal Control Officer, Deb Zerafa, after an investigation showed she falsified time and mileage records and entered property without a warrant, complicated matters. Zerafa has vociferously disputed these claims and two Animal Control officers remain on staff and available to investigate reports.

“There are so many moving parts to this issue,” said Heidi Yates, executive director of the Cherryland Humane Society. “From people who have too many animals and can’t take care of them, to people who do things we just can’t understand. That’s why it is so important to call Animal Control if you see something. Animals can’t speak for themselves. We have to speak for them.”

Another reason for the dramatic rise in incident reports could be increased awareness by law enforcement. In May, the CHS, which serves Grand Traverse and Leelanau Counties, worked with the Michigan Humane Society to offer a one-day training for law enforcement. Representatives from the Traverse City Police Department and the Grand Traverse Tribal Police attended the “Animals in the Field Law Enforcement Training” program, which covered human violence and animal cruelty, animals as evidence, and Michigan animal law, among other topics. The MHS started the course in 2015 and has trained more than 400 officers statewide to recognize animal cruelty cases.

In the Voice Road case, a married couple, Joseph Lewis Plowman, 39, and Lacie Lee Plowman, 37, were arrested in July on charges of animal abandonment or cruelty involving more than 10 animals, a felony publishable by up to four years in prison, according to court documents.

They did not live at the Voice Road residence, are currently free on $10,000 bond, and being represented by Traverse City criminal attorney, Gerald Chefalo.

At a probable cause conference for the Plowmans on July 27 in 86th District Court, the couple waived their right to a preliminary hearing and the case was bound over to circuit court.

Joseph Plowman pleaded guilty to the charge against him Friday. Lacie Plowman is scheduled for a final conference Wednesday with a trial in October.

Of the 38 animals the Plowman’s allegedly neglected and abandoned, five died or were deceased when law enforcement officers responded to the scene and 32 — 19 dogs and 13 cats — were surrendered by Animal Control into the care of the Cherryland Humane Society.

Yates of CHS said return visits by investigators to the residence found more animals, some deceased and some roaming the property. The animals in the care of CHS were bathed and groomed by volunteers, and assessed by CHS staff.

Seven of the dogs and eleven of the cats have already been adopted, additional animals from the case are at the shelter and available for adoption, while CHS is currently taking foster home applications for four dogs who need additional socialization before they can be cleared for adoption.

“They’re just great dogs and I simply cannot say enough about the humane society and what care they take in putting the right dogs in the right homes,” Anita Scussel said. “Evie was so underweight you could see her ribs poking through, and when I put a bowl of food out she’d grab a mouthful and then run into a corner to eat it. But that only lasted a couple days. We just came back from the dog park where she played and played. Lady is more reserved but that’s just her personality.”

Those interested in fostering or adopting a rescue animal from CHS can fill out an application on the organization’s website, cherrylandhumane.org. If you suspect an animal is being abused or neglected, call your local Animal Control office. In Grand Traverse County that number is 995-6080; in Traverse City, it is 995-5150; in Leelanau County, 231-256-9829; in Benzie County 231-882-9505.

0

Animal Welfare Institute, Other Groups Urge Florida Governor to Reassign Raccoon Drowning Case

Washington, DC—In a letter sent Monday to Florida Gov. Rick Scott regarding the Ocala teacher accused of drowning animals in front of his students, the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) urged the governor to reassign the animal cruelty case to another Florida state attorney. In May, Forest High School teacher Dewie Brewton allegedly trapped and, with student participation, drowned two raccoons and an opossum. He suspected that one of the raccoons had killed eight chickens who were being raised by Brewton’s agriculture class.

Brewton retired after the incident and State Attorney Brad King declined to pursue criminal animal charges against him. In justifying his decision, King explained that his office had recently lost an animal cruelty case involving a defendant who had used rusty scissors to cut the tails off four kittens. King also argued that Brewton “did not intend to torture or torment these nuisance animals.”

“The killing of these animals shocked the public’s conscience not only because of the brutality of the method used but also because of the involvement of students,” said Nancy Blaney, AWI’s director of government affairs. “The animals deserve better, the students and their families deserve better, and the community deserves better.”

The coalition’s letter insists that the State Attorney’s Office erred in a number of its findings, and calls on Scott to use his authority to reassign the case to best serve the “ends of justice.”

“The teacher’s actions clearly constitute animal abuse and are made even more serious due to the fact that he solicited student participation, instructing students to fill up the garbage bins with water and holding the animals underwater,” said Stephen Wells, executive director of ALDF. “Governor Scott should reassign this case to a different state attorney who will ensure that Florida’s animal cruelty laws are taken seriously.”

According to a thorough analysis conducted by AWI and ALDF, it was never established that the animals allegedly drowned by Brewton were, indeed, the same animals who had killed the chickens. Even if these animals were deemed “nuisances,” Brewton violated Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission regulations, which require that any nuisance wildlife be released or humanely euthanized within 24 hours of capture.

Moreover, Brewton made no effort to consider nonlethal alternatives, the organizations wrote. His actions appear to constitute aggravated animal cruelty, “because his intentional act directly resulted in the animals’ cruel deaths.” “Reassigning this case would indeed meet the test of best serving the ‘ends of justice,’” said David LaBahn, president and CEO of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys. “Animal abuse is a violent crime and animal abusers must be held fully accountable for their actions.”

To conclude, the letter reminds Scott of the national outrage provoked by the case:
“Justice for these animals—as well as confidence that Florida’s cruelty laws and regulations will be enforced properly—depends on your stepping in to assure Floridians and others horrified by this case that it will receive the attention it deserves.”

###

Media Contact

Margie Fishman, (202) 446-2128, margie@awionline.org

About the Animal Welfare Institute
The Animal Welfare Institute is a nonprofit charitable organization founded in 1951 and dedicated to reducing animal suffering caused by people. AWI engages policymakers, scientists, industry, and the public to achieve better treatment of animals everywhere—in the laboratory, on the farm, in commerce, at home, and in the wild. For more information, visit www.awionline.org.

About the Animal Legal Defense Fund
The Animal Legal Defense Fund’s mission is to protect the lives and advance the interests of animals through the legal system. The Animal Legal Defense Fund accomplishes this mission by filing high-impact lawsuits to protect animals from harm, providing free legal assistance and training to prosecutors to assure that animal abusers are punished for their crimes, supporting tough animal protection legislation and fighting legislation harmful to animals, and providing resources and opportunities to law students and professionals to advance the emerging field of animal law.

About the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys
The Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (APA) is a national 501(c)(3) organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., made up of elected and appointed prosecuting attorneys from throughout the nation. APA provides valuable resources such as training and technical assistance to prosecutors in an effort to develop proactive and innovative prosecutorial practices that prevent crime, ensure equal justice and help make our communities safer.

0

Child Abuse Victims and Recantation: Practical Prosecution Tips

These cases are never easy. Even if the recantation can ultimately be shown to be untruthful, the mere suggestion that the victim is changing his or her testimony will cause serious complications, and can ultimately be fatal to a prosecution. But there are steps that can be taken in an attempt to attain a just outcome.

 

THE CASE BEFORE RECANTATION.

Begin with the case before the recantation – was it a strong case? If there is independent evidence to prove the elements of the case, the case can remain strong even with the recantation. Lack of independent evidence makes prosecution more difficult, but is not necessarily a barrier with sufficient investigation. It is incumbent upon the prosecution to paint the picture of what is occurring behind the scenes so the jury can see the truth. Identifying witnesses and physical evidence is critical. Expert testimony can help explain why victims recant, and the circumstances that increase the likelihood of recantation.

 

UNDERSTAND THE WHY?

The ultimate goal is to understand the “why.” The multidisciplinary team must become an integral part of that investigation, utilizing the strengths of each member. Law enforcement must remember that with these types of cases, there is always a chance of recantation. Therefore, corroboration, even if minimal, is key. Some of the juror feedback in included case study emphasized that they wanted law enforcement to at least attempt to corroborate aspects of the victim’s history. And after the recantation has occurred, law enforcement can be integral in investigating the pressures and family dynamics that may be present. The detective has had the case from the beginning, presumably before the recantation occurred. That insight in the search for what changed is invaluable.

 

INVOLVE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES WHERE APPROPRIATE.

Child protective services is also an integral part of the team. There may be additional family history to give insight into the “why.” Have there been other referrals? Have they experienced difficulty with this family in the past? Has the victim made prior allegations, whether against this defendant or another person? The victim may have made statements to child protective services outside of the official law enforcement investigation. These statements could also prove instrumental if they contradict the new recantation.

 

ADDITIONAL FORENSIC INTERVIEWS.

Subsequent forensic interviews should be considered with members of the multidisciplinary team to determine if advisable. Factors such as circumstances of the recantation, amount of time between the initial interview and the recantation, age of the child, living circumstances of the child, the degree to which the non-offending caregiver is cooperating, and the safety of the victim should be discussed. If the jurisdiction allows the admission of the videotaped forensic interview, and allows for impeaching the victim, then this can be extremely powerful evidence.

Regarding forensic interviews, it can be exceptionally important to forensically interview child witnesses of these crimes, especially in a family situation. Regardless of the interview’s admissibility, if a child witness recants or cannot recall facts they observed years prior, a recorded forensic interview can mitigate that complication. In the case study included herein, the 5-year-old cousin was not forensically interviewed. The family also pressured that child into recanting what he saw. There were no prior inconsistent statements to impeach the child’s statements at trial.

 

IMPEACHMENT OF VICTIM.

The law relevant to recantation cases can vary greatly from one state to another. Some states do not allow for the impeachment of the victim, but may allow for limited use of prior inconsistent statements. However, the more modern approach, consistent with Fed. R. Evid. 603 allows any party to impeach a witness, including one’s own witness. In jurisdictions which allow for the impeachment of the victim, the case can likely proceed even with only the prior inconsistent statement. In jurisdictions that don’t allow for the outright impeachment of the victims, cases that have physical evidence or testimony inconsistent with the victim’s recanted statements can be utilized to essentially impeach the victim with your closing argument.

 

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION.

Traditional ways of preparing a case may be insufficient when the victim recants, and may require the prosecution team to think outside of the box. Interviewing the supportive people in the victim’s life, including family, friends, counselors or teachers, can prove extremely helpful. The victim may remain consistent with these potential witnesses. Even if the victim is not discussing the facts or has recanted to them as well, these individuals may be able to paint that important picture of the dynamics triggering the recantation.

Investigation should be extended to social media and other technology. Some of the reasons for recantation could be in the form of emails, texts, social media messages, and postings on social media pages. This investigation should extend beyond the victim, but also include those individuals that may be influencing the child. And if the defendant is incarcerated in a facility that records telephone conversations, the prosecutor must constantly monitor those calls to gather evidence or even an outright admission.

 

 

0

Legislation Strengthens Stalking Prosecution

A bill strengthening how stalking offenders are prosecuted and sentenced is moving through the Wyoming legislature.

But Tara Muir, Public Policy Director with the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, said the bill has met debate every step of the way. She said lawmakers have been caught up on whether a prosecutor has to prove a victim suffered a substantial amount of fear. Muir added most states are moving towards an objective test that focuses on the behavior of the perpetrator.

“With an objective test we don’t have to put the victim on the witness stand to prove there’s some kind of substantial fear or damages or anything,” said Muir. “This is a criminal case. There is no other crime where you have to prove the victim was actually afraid. We don’t have to prove a banker was afraid [in a robbery]. But in a stalking case we seem to focus on that in Wyoming.”

Muir said the House Judiciary Committee strengthened the bill by taking out the language referencing substantial fear. It passed Committee of the Whole and is now up for a second reading in the House.

Read Original Story Here

0

PRESS RELEASE: Prosecutors and Public Defenders Come Together For Lasting Criminal Justice Reform

Press Release

For Immediate Release

March 6, 2018

PROSECUTORS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS COME TOGETHER FOR
LASTING CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Commonly Seen as Adversaries APA and NLADA are Now Collaborating
On Recommendations for Fundamental Changes to the Criminal Justice System


Washington, D.C.- Over the past year and a half, the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (APA) and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA) have been serving as strategic allies in a national effort to bring lasting changes to the criminal justice system, also known as the Safety and Justice Challenge.  The Safety and Justice Challenge (SJC or the Challenge) is a $100 million investment by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation aimed at changing the way America thinks about and uses its jails.  As strategic allies in the SJC, APA and NLADA are committed to supporting jurisdictions in fulfilling their criminal justice reform goals.

Defenders and prosecutors involved with the Challenge support twin goals of decreasing unnecessary criminal justice involvement and reducing racial and ethnic disparities within the law enforcement system.  The ultimate objective is to promote justice and create safer communities, which is paramount to ensure a more just and fair U.S. criminal justice system.

“This is the ultimate story of strange bedfellows making the best partners,” said APA President and CEO David LaBahn.  “Everyone involved in the Challenge recognizes that to make sustainable change requires collaboration from all criminal justice system stakeholders, including those who are traditionally adversaries in the courtroom, such as defenders and prosecutors.  It has been a joy working with NLADA on this very important project, and we look forward to continuing this essential partnership for years to come.”

“Cultivating unlikely, yet powerful alliances with prosecutors enhances problem-solving for sustainable criminal justice reform,” said Jo-Ann Wallace, President and CEO, National Legal Aid & Defender Association.  “We at NLADA are proud to be a part of the successful

collaboration cultivated by the Safety and Justice Challenge.  Working with APA on this critical initiative has been an honor and a pleasure. We look forward to realizing the transformative impact that this partnership can have on low-income people accused of crimes in a pretrial justice system so heavily weighted against them.”

The SJC’s national efforts required regular meetings where prosecutors and defenders shared information regarding effective collaboration strategies and developed new ideas on how to best leverage their respective roles and expertise to address systemic issues that contribute to jail incarceration.

As a result of those meetings, APA and NLADA were able to craft Beyond The Adversarial System: Achieving the Challenge.  Beyond The Adversarial System is a joint paper with recommandations aimed at promoting and improving successful collaborations between prosecutors and defenders.  Along with distributing the paper, APA and NLADA are hosting a joint webinar for the criminal justice community to learn more about this important partnership.

 

VIEW JOINT PAPER

 

Webinar: Beyond the Adversarial System- Achieving the Challenge. March 14, 2018 3 PM Register for the Webinar

0

Stopping the modern slave trade of human sex trafficking

 

By | Orange County Register

–Irvine, CA. Last year, Irvine made national news when authorities busted a large, multi-state sex trafficking ring that forced numerous young women into prostitution. Most of the victims came from China and Korea with limited English skills. The victims were subjected to physical assaults at the hands of their “customers” while being forced to produce at least $800 each day for the traffickers. These women were repeatedly exploited through thousands of advertisements on a website known as Backpage.com, which has a notorious history of facilitating sex trafficking with impunity.

Last week, along with Reps. Ann Wagner, R-Missouri, and Carolyn Maloney, D-New York, I introduced legislation known as the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, which would make it easier for prosecutors to crack down on websites that knowingly facilitate or promote sex trafficking, while providing legal recourse for victims of these heinous crimes.

I am proud this legislation includes an amendment I authored, which would allow sex trafficking victims to bring civil charges against the websites that knowingly facilitated their abuse. Commonly known as the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, the Walters amendment is an important tool that allows trafficking survivors to seek justice in the courts.

The network of businesses, homes, and hotels used to facilitate the Irvine sex trafficking ring was expansive. However, the use of online platforms allowed the operation to grow exponentially. In fact, one prosecutor working the case called the ring the “Uber of sex trafficking.” An Orange County trafficking victims advocate stated that each ad posted to Backpage.com can produce between five and 25 “dates” per night.

Since my time in the California state Legislature, I have worked to end this barbaric modern day slave trade. While major sex trafficking rings have been uncovered across the country, fighting those who knowingly facilitate this online activity has been a tremendous challenge. Sadly, victims are often unable to seek justice because existing law unintentionally shields those who knowingly facilitate online sex trafficking.

FOSTA and the Walters amendment would update these laws to hold bad actors accountable for crimes they knowingly promote on their website. This legislation also maintains important safeguards to protect third-party content hosts who act in good faith and routinely monitor inappropriate or illegal activity on their websites.

The modern day slave trade of human sex trafficking is rampant through cities and towns in every state in our nation. It must be stopped. Thanks to broad bipartisan support, we are taking a major step toward achieving this goal and giving new hope to survivors across the country.

 

Read Original Story

0

Criminal (In)Justice Podcast: David LaBahn’s Interview

“Police have endured harsh public scrutiny over use of force cases, but prosecutors have also taken heat for choosing not to pursue cases when civilians are shot by police.

Older, more traditional prosecutorial professional organizations, such as the National District Attorneys Association, have fought against any changes. But one group, the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, has taken a more open approach, arguing for the importance of prosecutorial independence and transparency.

David LaBahn is the CEO and president for the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, a national association representing elected and appointed prosecutors. You can find the APA’s Use of Force Project report here.”

 – David Harris | Criminal InJustice

Here the interview here


The above interview was  conducted by David Harris with the Criminal (In)Justice Podcast Series. Criminal Injustice discusses the always current, sometimes disturbing, frequently confusing and often shocking aspects of the American criminal justice system. Weekly episodes examine issues like police body cameras, racial biases, use of force and incarceration through wide-ranging interviews with national figures in the know. It’s not a lecture hall, and you don’t need a law degree to keep up. The podcast is, above all else, a conversation, capped with Harris’ “Lawyers Behaving Badly” bonus feature that pokes fun at the worst in the legal profession…See the Podcast Series here
0
Page 1 of 12 12345...»